Doyal v. Russell
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
In logical order, the motions to dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction of the defendants who were nonresidents of the county in which the suit was filed should be the first matters for consideration; but in the view we take of the case it is not improper to pass immediately to the merits and consider whether the petition states a cause of action, the court below having ruled upon this question and sustained the petition.' Upon a fair interpretation of the petition and all amendments thereto, including the several prayers, three general conclusions are inevitable: (1) The allegations…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TapleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Baggett v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Henderson v. Nolting First Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Richards & Associates, Inc. v. StudstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Groover v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.