Smith v. Upshaw
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Presiding Justice.
1. Where the bylaws of an electric membership corporation require that its board of directors be named from different counties, the office of director in one county is not the same office as that of director in another county. Each is a separate office and they can not properly be joined as respondents in one quo warranto proceeding. Sweat v. Barnhill, 171 Ga. 294 (11) (155 SE 18); Center v. Arp, 198 Ga. 574 (32 SE2d 308).
2. Except as the Constitution may otherwise authorize, all civil cases shall be tried in the county of the defendant’s residence. Constitution, Art.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sweat v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Ozborn v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Greene v. GoluckeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Harrison v. McHenrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
- Kantzipper v. KantzipperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Williams v. KaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Newton v. K. B. Property Management of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- DeROSSETT v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Newton v. K. B. Property Management of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983