Legal Opinion

Hart v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1936No. Docket Nos. 57, 58; Calendar Nos. 38,934, 38,946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These two railroad and highway intersection cases were consolidated and tried as one. The jury rendered a verdict for Roy Hart, the driver of the automobile involved, in the sum of $175 and for William Strew, his passenger, in the sum of $1,000. Seasonable motions were made by defendant for directed verdicts; subsequently the court granted defendant's motions for judgment non obstante veredicto from which plaintiffs appeal.

The accident out of which the lawsuits arose occurred where a spur track of defendant's railroad crosses Marquette avenue in Bay City. On November 10, 1934, sometime after…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Stewart v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Richman v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Haney v. TroostMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Britton v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiles v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Williams v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Cartwright v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API