Haney v. Troost
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The automobile of defendant Joseph Troost, driven .by his wife, the other defendant, in the night, in a snowstorm, on an icy paved country highway, slid off the pavement and turned over. Leaving the car without lights, its front end including a bumper over and obstructing the paved way to the extent of two or three feet, Mrs. Troost went to a farm house to summon aid. While she was gone, plaintiff’s car, driven by him, collided with defendants’ car. Plaintiff’s car was broken and he was injured. His testimony is inconsistent, but that most favorable to him is to the effect that in the storm…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. GoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Thompson v. Southern Michigan Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Elrich v. SchwadererMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Russell v. SzczawinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.