Legal Opinion

Britton v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Smith, J. Case by Martinus S. Britton against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for personal injuries caused by a collision with defendant’s train at a highway crossing. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

1. It is a common and just rule of pleading that the plaintiff must stand upon the averments in his declaration. He cannot allege one case of negligence, and prove another. He cannot be permitted to show a state of facts entirely different from that charged in the declaration. Plaintiff averred that, as he approached the crossing,—

“He looked and listened for an approaching train, slowed his horse down to a very slow walk, and continued to look and listen for an approaching train as he neared the point where said railway crossed Chipman street, at which time it was so dark that said plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dodds v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Lambert v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hampel v. Detroit, Grand Rapids & Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Tuttle v. Briscoe Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Fillingham v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API