Legal Opinion

Fender v. Foust

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1928No. 6,216PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

The object of this action is to determine the title to specific personal property claimed by plaintiffs to belong to the estate of Charles Foust, deceased, alleged to be in possession of the defendant James Foust and to recover the same for the estate.

According to the pleadings, Charles Foust, a resident of Ravalli county, died on November 13, 1925, leaving a will in which his estate was devised in equal shares to the plaintiffs and the defendant Vernon C. Foust. This will was admitted to probate and Vernon C. Foust named as administrator thereof with the will annexed, and he duly qualified…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ridden v. . ThrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Leyson v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Beaumont v. BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Board of Equalization v. ColeMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sylvain v. PageMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Stagg v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Albinger v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Brown's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API