Legal Opinion · Dissent

Simpson v. Enfield Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1903PublishedCited by 27 opinions

On petition for rehearing. See former opinion, 131 N. O., 518.

1DissentMontgomery, J.

This is a petition to rehear the above-entitled case, which was decided at August Term, 1902, and is reported in 131 N.C. 518. This Court then held that the motion to nonsuit should have (96) been granted, as the defendant, to whom the plaintiff had sold certain timber on his land with the right to cut the same and to build a railroad on the land for the purpose of removing it, was not liable to the plaintiff for any damage caused by a fire communicated by its engine, if properly equipped and operated, to combustible material negligently permitted to accumulate on or along its track and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Newman v. Covenant Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Craft v. Albemarle Timber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Lawton v. . GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. SalmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Knott v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Deligny v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Pickett v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Steeley v. Dare Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Gadsden v. George H. Crafts & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API