Legal Opinion

Privette v. . Morgan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Tbe appeal poses tbe question wbetber there was error in declining either or both of tbe motions made by tbe defendant: To strike from tbe complaint certain objectionable matter specifically pointed out; or to strike tbe complaint from tbe files and order tbe plaintiffs to replead. Tbe first motion, if made in time, as it is here, involves a matter of right. Parrish v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., 221 N. C., 292, 20 S. E. (2d), 299; Hill v. Stansbury, 221 N. C., 339, 20 S. E. (2d), 308; Patterson v. R. R., 214 N. C., 38, 198 S. E., 364. Tbe second, viewed as a motion to require an amendment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Froneberger v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Thompson v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Holden v. . TottenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Governor's Club, Inc. v. Governors Club Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API