Privette v. . Morgan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Tbe appeal poses tbe question wbetber there was error in declining either or both of tbe motions made by tbe defendant: To strike from tbe complaint certain objectionable matter specifically pointed out; or to strike tbe complaint from tbe files and order tbe plaintiffs to replead. Tbe first motion, if made in time, as it is here, involves a matter of right. Parrish v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., 221 N. C., 292, 20 S. E. (2d), 299; Hill v. Stansbury, 221 N. C., 339, 20 S. E. (2d), 308; Patterson v. R. R., 214 N. C., 38, 198 S. E., 364. Tbe second, viewed as a motion to require an amendment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Froneberger v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rhodes v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Thompson v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Holden v. . TottenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Governor's Club, Inc. v. Governors Club Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.