Legal Opinion

Markey v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 32 opinions

This case was decided by the court Bn Banc. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Hamilton county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShackleford, J.

— At the fall term, 1902, of the Circuit Court for Hamilton county the plaintiff in error, George L. Markey (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), was indicted for perjury. Omitting the formal, parts, said indictment was as follows: . “In the name of the State of Florida: The grand jurors of the State of Florida, duly chosen, empanelled and sworn diligently to inquire and true presentment make in and for the body of the county of Hamilton, upon their oath present that on the 28th day of September, A. D. 1901, in the county and State aforesaid, a certain cause was then and there pending…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Starbuck v. . StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Buckstaff v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Dean v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  5. North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API