Legal Opinion

Essington v. Bowman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1919No. 10,241PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From, the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceeding by Iva Bowman against John Essington and others for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Prom an award in favor of the applicant, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, P. J.

This is an appeal from an award by the Industrial Board in favor of appellee for $40.

*1851. 2. *184The first question to be determined is one of juris*185diction. It is well settled that the right of appeal is wholly statutory, except where expressly se-

cured by the Constitution. Hall v. Kincaid (1917), 64 Ind. App. 103, 115 N. E. 361. The right of appeal under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Acts 1915 p.392,§80201 et seq. Burns’ Supp. 1918, is not a constitutional right, but a purely statutory one. It is given ,by §61 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, supra, as amended by the act of 1917, which reads as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perry, Matthews-Buskirk Stone Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hall v. KincaidIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Schultz v. AlterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Barnes v. KeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Catherwood v. McIntyreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Keller v. Reynard, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. Kiser Etc. v. Millspaugh Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Unnewehr v. ElrodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. O'Riordan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API