Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Continental Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1929No. Docket No. 6626PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

An action to recover upon a policy of insurance against accident issued to Albert T. Meyer in his lifetime, the indemnity for loss of life being made payable to his estate.

The parties filed an agreed statement of the facts, together ■with photographs showing physical conditions at the scene of the accident. It appears that the insured on January 29, 1927, in the daytime and immediately before receiving the physical injuries which caused his death, was operating a motorcycle at a speed of twenty-five miles per hour in an easterly direction along Twenty-eighth Street in the city of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Allen v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. Of America v. William GuytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Hughes v. Potomac InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Wyoming Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API