Legal Opinion
Snyder v. Redding Motors
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1955No. Civ. 8490PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Respondents commenced an action against the above named defendants alleging in their complaint that defendants Giesicke and Redding Motors, a corporation, were the duly authorized agents of defendants Gal-Union Agency and Colonial Insurance Company of California ; that respondents applied to Giesicke and Redding Motors for insurance against liability for personal injuries and property damage, and that they, as agents of Cal-Union Agency and Colonial Insurance Company, in consideration of $40.50, agreed to so insure respondents for one year from March 28, 1950, and to deliver a policy in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stark v. Pioneer Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Frasch v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Lauze v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Silverberg v. Phenix Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Voss v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Loree v. Robert F. Driver Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Wille v. Farmers Equitable InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.