Legal Opinion
Sharon K. Tidwell, Cross-Appellant v. Fort Howard Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 24, 1993No. 91-7063, 91-7069PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
The Plaintiff Sharon K. Tidwell brought an Equal Pay Act claim, Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d), combined with a cause of action under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, against the Defendant Fort Howard Corporation, her employer. The causes were tried in one proceeding. The jury returned a verdict for the Plaintiff on the Equal Pay Act claim (two years back pay), but held that the Defendant’s violation was “nonwillful.” 756 F.Supp. 1487. On the Title VII cause the trial court entered judgment for the Defendant.
This appeal centers on the comparison or contrast…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Jessica Lind Meeks v. Computer Associates International, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Spraque v. Thorn Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Jane L. v. BangerterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.