Legal Opinion
Jane L. v. Bangerter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 2, 1995No. 93-4145PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Chief Judge.
The instant ease is the attorneys fees arm of the Jane L. v. Bangerter abortion litigation that has been moving through the federal courts since 1991. The district court awarded attorneys fees to plaintiffs, but in an amount dramatically less than that requested. The court also awarded attorneys fees to defendants. We reverse in part and remand for two primary reasons. First, we reversed many of the district court’s substantive decisions, altering plaintiffs’ overall success level. See Jane L. v. Bangerter, 61 F.3d 1493 (10th Cir.1995). Second, the district court abused…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Berry v. Stevinson ChevroletCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Robert Shawn Treff v. Kerry Galetka, Individually and as the Mailroom Supervisor at the Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Mathiason v. Aquinas Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.