Legal Opinion

United States v. Dominic Daniel Alrdo

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 12, 1967No. 15786_1PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

Dominic Daniel Airdo appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict of guilty on an indictment charging him with unlawful possession of a television set stolen from interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. 1 The defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In urging reversal of his conviction, he relies upon an allegedly fatal defect in the indictment, error in the admission into evidence of a television set allegedly obtained through an unreasonable search and seizure, and various other trial errors.

The indictment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. Sferas (Two Cases). United States v. SkallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United States v. S. Lawrence Kahn, Arthur B. Sachs and M. Prial CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API