Mirabal v. Mirabal
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open and modify by vacating a child support order entered as part of a 1986 California divorce that was filed pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-70 et seq.1 The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) found California evidence code § 621 (c) to be a statute of limitations that barred an agreement *823as to nonpaternity, (2) denied his motion to modify without making any findings of fact concerning cohabitation based on California law, (3) held that the California judgment satisfied the definition of a foreign…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Plasil v. TablemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Krueger v. KruegerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Morabito v. WachsmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cahn v. CahnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Colby v. ColbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Lindo v. LindoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Franz v. Franz, No. Fa 96 0071001 (Sep. 3, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Zoning Commission, No. Cv 93 30 95 58 S (Sep. 28, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Phoebe G. v. Solnit, No. Cv96-0135437s (Jun. 30, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.