Legal Opinion

Phoebe G. v. Solnit, No. Cv96-0135437s (Jun. 30, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 30, 1998No. CV96-0135437SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT # 109 110

Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Phoebe G. ("Phoebe G.") and Defendant Albert Solnit, M.D., individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services ("DMHAS"), which motions seek to dispose of all issues of liability in this case, in one or the other's favor.

By way of brief summary, Phoebe G. is a person with a mental illness who is involuntarily conserved pursuant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Plasil v. TablemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Groth v. RedmondConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
  5. Mirabal v. MirabalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API