Legal Opinion

Sauer v. Home Indemnity Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1992No. S-4522PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Delores Gross and Max Rush, the trustee of Gross’ bankruptcy estate, sued Gross’ insurer, the Home Indemnity Company. The bases of the suit were Home Indemnity Company’s refusal to defend or indemnify Gross against claims of residents of her trailer park arising from a sewage leak and Home Indemnity Company’s failure to communicate to Gross its denial of a defense or coverage. The trial court denied Gross’ motions for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of Home Indemnity Company and the insurance adjusters. John Sauer, the personal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Sims Ex Rel. Ruark v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Star Fire Coals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Chi of Alaska, Inc. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Fejes v. Alaska Ins. Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Dutton-Lainson Co. v. Continental InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hermitage Insurance Co. v. SaltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API