Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, Presiding Justice.
In this case we are called upon to interpret the meaning of the “pollution exclusion” clause of a comprehensive general liability insurance policy. For the reasons stated below, we hold that the insurance policy at issue does not preclude coverage for liability for environmental contamination caused by the discharge of pollutants over an extended period of time.
Briefly stated, the history of the case is as follows1: Since 1966, Henry Claussen has owned, either individually or through corporate entities, fifty-two acres of land known as Picketville. In 1968, the City…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Richards v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Cincinnati Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Holcomb v. WordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- City of Milwaukee v. Allied Smelting Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.