Legal Opinion

Loudon v. Mhyre

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1988No. 54148-5PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

The issue presented is whether defense counsel in a personal injury action may communicate ex parte with the plaintiff's treating physicians when the plaintiff has waived the physician-patient privilege. We hold that defense counsel may not engage in ex parte contact, but is limited to the formal discovery methods provided by court rule.

This is a wrongful death action brought by Robert Lou-don, individually and as personal representative of the estate of his son, David Loudon, involving malpractice claims against Drs. James Mhyre and Gerald Kenny. Drs. Mhyre and Kenny treated David for liver…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stempler v. SpeidellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Carson v. FineWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Crist v. MoffattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Brandt v. Medical Defense AssociatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API