Legal Opinion

Dax v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The evidence is undisputed that before the deceased reached the passing track she had an unobstructed view to the west along the track for several miles and such view she had continually from the passing track a distance of fifteen feet till she reached the main track. There is no evidence that her attention was by any cause diverted. The jury having found her negligent, such negligence must have consisted in a failure to look or listen, or .both. Does such failure under such circumstances amount to more than a slight want.of ordinary care? This court has answered the question so many times…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Puhr v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Bahlert v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Twist v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Gordon v. Illinois Central RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Waitkus v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Van Dunk v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Patterson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Swanson v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API