Patterson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed October 8, 1940 :
Fritz, J.
On this appeal defendant relies on several assignments of error, including error in the denial of its motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on several grounds. In order to pass upon the errors assigned in these two respects, it suffices to note but the following facts. Plaintiff was injured at 2 :25 o’clock a. m. on September 5, 1937, upon being struck by a switch engine operated by defendant’s employees while he was walking northward across the main track for eastbound trains at defendant’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- White v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Banderob v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- White v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Clemons v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Fournier v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Kasper v. KocherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Evanich v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.