Legal Opinion

Baddeley v. Shea

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1896No. S. F. No. 85PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William R. Daingerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

Action for recovery of damages for personal injuries.

Plaintiff, being a servant of the City Transfer Company, of the city of San Francisco, called at the private dwelling-house of defendant, at the latter’s request, for the purpose of carrying two trunks from there to the railroad depot. After having taken the smaller trunk to his wagon he returned for the larger trunk, which was very heavy. Defendant then told him he would not be able to carry that heavy trunk downstairs, and offered to assist him; but plaintiff declined the proffered assistance, and placed the trunk upon his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Looney v. McLeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Gill v. MiddletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Loftus v. . Union Ferry Company of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Devens v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Catlin v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Martin v. Food MacHinery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API