Nickles v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
1. Larceny after trust is a species of larceny and in prosecutions for the former offense, as in those for the latter, it is necessary to allege ownership of the property in a person, corporation, or other legal entity capable of owning property, in order to enable the accused to know exactly what charge he will be called upon at the trial to meet, and to .enable him, if such should be the case, to plead a former acquittal or conviction. Scarboro v. State, 207 Ga. 449 (2) (62 S. E. 2d, 168); Mattox v. State, 115 Ga. 212, 219 (7) (41 S. E. 709); McKee v. State, 200 Ga. 563 (37 S. E. 2d, 700).
2.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mattox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Scarboro v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Buffington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. SmallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
- Nickles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.