Legal Opinion

State v. Woody

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1999No. COA98-626PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Judge.

During 1990, defendant worked for Tandy Computers and was responsible for leasing a Tandy 3000 computer and movie-rental inventory software to P&R Unlimited, Incorporated (P&R, Inc.). P&R, Inc. was formed with two shareholders, Patrick Phillips and Mark Robinson for the purpose of operating “P&R Unlimited,” a convenience store. Defendant subsequently began working elsewhere, but she continued to service the computer that P&R, Inc. had leased from Tandy. Phillips later purchased Robinson’s shares in P&R, Inc., and at trial he referred to the resulting business as a partnership.

Pr…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. ChilloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API