Legal Opinion
Iqbal v. Blinken
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 22, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01299Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Lailaa Iqbal, et al., No. 2:23-cv-01299-KJM-CSK. 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 Antony J. Blinken, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 This action challenges the delayed adjudication of immigrant visa applications. The 18 | parties voluntarily dismissed four of the six plaintiffs after two of the noncitizen beneficiary 19 | plaintiffs received their visas. See First Stip. Dismissal, ECF No. 31 (dismissing plaintiffs Lailaa 20 | Iqbal and Qaiser Javed); Second Stip. Dismissal, ECF No. 36 (dismissing plaintiffs…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ready Transportation, Inc. v. AAR Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.