Legal Opinion
Ready Transportation, Inc. v. AAR Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 30, 2010No. 08-16941PublishedCited by 343 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLAK, District Judge:
Defendants-Appellants (collectively “AAR”) appeal from the District Court’s order denying a motion to strike from its docket a confidential settlement agreement filed by Plaintiffs-Appellees (collectively “Ready”). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
Ready sued AAR and others, including the federal government, in a dispute, the precise nature of which is not pertinent to our inquiry here, over shipping agreements between the government and various defense contractors. All defendants except AAR were dismissed from the case in its early stages. Ready and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by343 opinions
- Steve Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- William Forrest v. Keith SpizzirriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Ibrahim v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Giuliano v. Anchorage Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
338 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.