Legal Opinion

Hartman Trading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 16, 1966No. C.D. 2628PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DoNLON, Judge:

A number of articles, imported by plaintiff from the Orient, were classified by the collector as articles or wares, or manufactures, and charged with duty at the several rates provided according to the component material of chief value of each article.

The protests claim classification, alternatively, under paragraph 1807 as original works of art, free of duty, and under paragraph 1547(a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), at 10 percent ad valorem.

While the protests fail to specify the particular…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ebeling & Reuss Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Marshall Field & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M. H. Garvey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Hartman Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API