Legal Opinion

United States v. Othell Campbell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1968No. 11584PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Convicted of possession of illicit whiskey, Othell Campbell has appealed, complaining that his motion to suppress evidence gained from an unlawful search and seizure should have been granted. The search in question was the viewing by Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division agents from an adjacent cornfield of a transaction in illicit whiskey which took place in the backyard of Campbell’s home. The agents were not within the curtilage and the “open field” doctrine is applicable to their observations. Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57, 44 S.Ct. 445, 68 L.Ed. 898; United States v. Shue, 4 Cir., 385…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. Orval Care v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Bryce McDowell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TreftzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. State v. GrawienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. United States v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Errol B. ResnickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Claude Bishop MintonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API