Caldwell Power Co. v. Russell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, C. J.
There is no exception made in the record as to plaintiff’s right to condemn the land for the purposes indicated, nor as to the regularity of the proceedings looking to that result, nor to the condemnation itself, the single question being as to the amount allowed defendants, and the rule given by which the same has been estimated.
On that issue the court charged the jury, in part, as follows: “The measure of permanent damages against this defendant for appropriating a right of way over plaintiff’s lands for the construction of an electrical overhead system is the difference between the fair…
2Cited by6 opinions
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Carolina Power & Light Company v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Grand River Dam Authority v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. CarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.