Legal Opinion

Larabee Flour Mills Co. v. Carignano

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1931No. 377PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law for breach of a contract to buy flour. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant — the buyer — and plaintiff appeals. The principal error assigned is that plaintiff was entitled to an instructed verdict for the amount of damage fixed by the contract. This assignment calls for the decision of two questions: Was the contract confirmed? If so, is the agreement as to the amount of damage enforceable?

There is little law involved in the first question. The order for the flour, was signed by the buyer, the “party to be charged” under the Oklahoma…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Kothe v. R. C. Taylor TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nicolay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Farr Co. v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. File Bros. Wholesale Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API