Berneathy v. Pursley
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs sought damages due to plaintiff Jim Berneathy being thrown from a horse. Summary judgment was entered in favor of defendants on all counts of plaintiffs’ seven-count petition. Plaintiffs appeal.
Summary judgment is authorized by Rule 74.04. It is to be entered “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Rule 74.-04(c). Such judgment is to be entered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heald v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Ware v. St. Louis Car CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Merrick v. Southwest Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Landes v. H.E. Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Robidoux Ex Rel. Robidoux v. BuschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Coleman v. City of Kansas City, Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993