Legal Opinion

Heald v. Cox

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1972No. 25484PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit for personal injuries caused by a fall from a horse. The trial resulted in a jury verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1,750.00. Plaintiff filed a motion for new trial limited to the issue of damages only, and in connection therewith, alleged that the jury’s award was “totally, wholly and grossly inadequate”. Defendant, on the other hand, filed an after trial motion for judgment in accordance with his motions for directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence.

The trial court overruled the defendant’s motion and sustained…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Artstein Ex Rel. Artstein v. Pallo Ex Rel. PalloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Cunningham Ex Rel. Cunningham v. HayesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Bradshaw v. MinterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  5. Sapp v. KeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Howell v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  2. Antoniewicz v. ReszczynskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Oventrop v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Forrest v. GilleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Penberthy v. PenberthyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API