Legal Opinion

Landes v. H.E. Farms, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered October 10, 1989, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as to defendant Harry De Leyer but denied it as to corporate defendant H.E. Farms, Inc. (Farms), unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting summary judgment in favor of Farms against plaintiffs, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant H.E. Farms, Inc., dismissing the complaint as against it.

Order of the same court, entered on or about March 28, 1990, which denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Plue v. LentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Forrest v. GilleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Cipriano v. HankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Wardrop v. KoernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Berneathy v. PursleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Ansick v. Hillenbrand Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API