Legal Opinion

Ware v. St. Louis Car Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1964No. 31751PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

Plaintiff claims to have been wrongfully-discharged from his employment with defendant, and brought this action to recover damages. After the defendant had filed its answer and the defendant had responded thereto by his reply, the court sustained defendant’s motion for summary judgment, from which plaintiff brings this appeal.

The undisputed facts disclosed by the pleadings and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, including two affidavits filed in support thereof, show that plaintiff was employed by defendant, a St. Louis manufacturing concern, from 1952 to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. KoppalSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Cooper Ex Rel. Cooper v. FinkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Durasteel Co. v. Great Lakes Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  5. Florence N. Robbins and Theodore Robbins v. A. Harvey GouldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Seliga Shoe Stores, Inc. v. City of MaplewoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Kaufman Ex Rel. Kaufman v. BormasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Olson v. Auto Owners Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Strickland v. Taco Bell Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API