Legal Opinion

Malick v. Athenour

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 16, 1995No. A065620PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

In this opinion we are called upon to determine the appropriate procedure for a trial court to follow when the proponent of a referendum petition challenges by petition for writ of mandate a determination by a county election department that certain persons who signed the referendum petition did not also print their names in a fashion acceptable to the election department.

Here, the trial court denied the writ, finding that the procedures employed by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wheelright v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Schaaf v. BeattieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montgomery County Volunteer Fire-Rescue Ass'n v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Capo for Better Representation v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. San Diego Public Library Foundation v. FuentesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API