Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Northern Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1912No. 10240PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered September 27, 1911, in favor of the defendant, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to cancel promissory notes.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action for the cancellation and surrender of three promissory notes aggregating the sum of $1,373.30, jointly executed by them in payment of premium for three life insurance policies written by the defendant, one upon the life of each of the plaintiffs; and also for the cancellation and surrender of three other promissory notes, jointly executed by them to the defendant, aggre*211gating the sum of $1,820, which were known as reserve notes and were required by the defendant under policies of the kind taken out by the plaintiffs. The complaint demanded judgment for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Jemo v. Tourist Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Chilcott v. Globe Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Herzog v. Palatine Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Wooddy v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Buckley v. HarkensWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Noyes v. Bankers Indemnity InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Paich v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Olson v. Ottertail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API