Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Palatine Ins.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1905No. 5299PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered March 11, 1904, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action upon a policy of fire insurance.

1Opinion of the Court

Rudkin, J. —

On the 19th day of August, 1901, the defendant, the Palatine Insurance Company, Limited, issued to the defendants Thompson, Hill, and Shreeder its certain policy of insurance for $2,500, distributed as follows: *614$2,000 on a certain hotel building, $300 on the furniture and fixtures, and $200 on the piano, all while contained in the hotel building. The policy was written without any written application therefor, and the loss, if any, whs made payable to the plaintiff Ilerzog “as his interest might appear.” On the 10th day of August, 1902^ and during the life of the policy, the hotel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Delaware Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Wilcox v. Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. German Insurance v. YorkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. McWilliams v. Cascade Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boatner v. Providence-Washington Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Stephenson v. Miller-Link Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Arkansas Ins. Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API