Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee
Suits in equity by the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Company against George E. McConnell and others, by the Louisville & Nashville Railway Company against W. S. Duckworth and others, and by the Western &■ Atlantic Railway Company against W. S. Duckworth and others. Heard on motions for preliminary injunctions on the pleadings and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
A restraining order was heretofore allowed on the bills in these cases, and they are now before the court on application for preliminary injunctions upon the pleadings and proofs offered to support and oppose the motion. The cases are heard together for convenience, the proofs being treated as offered in each case, so far as applicable and competent. The remedy now sought, if granted, will constitute a new application of the injunctive process of the courts, so far as I am. advised, and so far as precisely the facts of this case are concerned. I deem it therefore proper…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Marshall v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Waring v. WDAS Broadcasting Station, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
- Schonwald v. RagainsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.