Legal Opinion

State v. Coscuna

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 22, 2000No. AC 19180PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HEALEY, J.

The defendant, Arthur Coscuna, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of improper parking in violation of General Statutes § 14-2511 and failure to signal in violation of *436General Statutes § 14-244.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly determined that there was sufficient evidence to find him guilty of violating either statute.3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*437The court reasonably could have found the following facts. On May 23,1998, at about 3:15 a.m., the defendant was operating his 1996 Cadillac El…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. State v. ZayasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. RadzvilowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. State v. GrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Nastro v. D'OnofrioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. WadeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. State v. Ruben T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API