Legal Opinion
State v. Ruben T.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 11, 2007No. AC 28187PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Ruben T., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial before a three judge panel, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a)2 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (l).3 *782On appeal, the defendant claims that the panel improperly (1) concluded that he had failed to prove the defense of extreme emotional disturbance by a fair preponderance of the evidence and (2) admitted testimony under the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule. We affirm the judgment of the panel.
The panel reasonably…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. BladesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Richardson v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Francis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Roye v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- State v. Ruben T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008