Legal Opinion

Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2002No. 20020014PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] In Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc., 2002 ND 131, ¶¶ 11-16, 649 N.W.2d 218, we held Kelly was entitled to rely upon prior demands for a nine-person jury by two co-defendants, even though both co-defendants were dismissed from the lawsuit before trial. We concluded the trial court abused its discretion in denying Kelly’s motion for a new trial on that issue, and we reversed and remanded for a new trial. Id. at ¶¶ 16, 18. On petition for rehearing, Howes claims the trial to a six-person jury was harmless error under N.D.R.Civ.P. 61 and Allen v. Kleven, 306 N.W.2d 629, 634…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Larson v. Williams Electric Co-Op., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Allen v. KlevenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Kronberger v. ZinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interest of SkorickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lee v. OwanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Rittenour v. GibsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Rittenour v. GibsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API