Legal Opinion

Rittenour v. Gibson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2003No. 20020053Published

1Opinion of the Court

656 N.W.2d 691 (2003)

2003 ND 14

Cindy RITTENOUR and Donald Rittenour, Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

Orville GIBSON, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20020053.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

February 19, 2003.

Lee J. Balerud, Minot, N.D., for plaintiffs and appellees.

Lawrence R. Klemin of Bucklin, Klemin & McBride, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant.

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Orville Gibson appeals from the Northwest Judicial District Court judgment denying his motion for a new trial. Concluding the district court erred in instructing the jury, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.

I

[¶…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API