Rittenour v. Gibson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
656 N.W.2d 691 (2003)
2003 ND 14
Cindy RITTENOUR and Donald Rittenour, Plaintiffs and Appellees,
v.
Orville GIBSON, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 20020053.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
February 19, 2003.
Lee J. Balerud, Minot, N.D., for plaintiffs and appellees.
Lawrence R. Klemin of Bucklin, Klemin & McBride, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant.
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Orville Gibson appeals from the Northwest Judicial District Court judgment denying his motion for a new trial. Concluding the district court erred in instructing the jury, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.
I
[¶…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.