Legal Opinion

Kronberger v. Zins

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1990No. Civ. 900199PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

Ernest Kronberger and Sandra Kraft appeal from an order denying Casey Kronber-ger a new trial on the ground that an ex parte communication between the judge and the jury was harmless error. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

This appeal involves a personal injury action against six-year-old Dustin Zins for damages sustained by seven-year-old Casey Kronberger in a “dirt ball fight” involving neighborhood children. At the close of Kronberger’s case, the trial court dismissed the claims against Dustin Zins’ parents, Arnold and Carolyn. After the jury returned a verdict…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Edward L. Flanigan v. Burlington Northern Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Keyes v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Olmstead v. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Zimmer v. BellonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. GeoStar Corp. v. Parkway Petroleum, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Moszer v. WittNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cass County State's Attorney v. O.H.W.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Rentz v. BNSF Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API