Legal Opinion

Elliott Building Co. v. City of Greensboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarseb, J.

Plaintiff’s representative was at the opening of the bids on 12 February, 1924. No objection was made to the continuance for further consideration. Plaintiff’s letter to defendant’s manager on 16 February, asked for an early acceptance or rejection of its bid filed with defendant on 12 February. The action of the defendant through its council, on 13 February, 1924, as set forth in its resolution, is not material to this matter, for that it appears that the acceptance relied upon by defendant took place 19 February. This fact eliminates from our consideration the contention that the resolution…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. National Bank v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Wheaton Building & Lumber Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Mizell v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
  5. Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Petrovich v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Cobb v. . Dibrell, Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Cobb v. Dibrell Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Petrovich v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API