Cobb v. Dibrell Bros.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdbN, J.
The chief questions of law presented for solution are as follows:
1. Was there any competent evidence of a valid contract of sale of the shares of stock in controversy to the plaintiff ?
2. Was such contract abandoned or relinquished?
3. Did the trial judge correctly instruct the jury?
It is familiar learning that offer and acceptance are the essential elements of a valid contract of sale. The offer must be complete, communicated and accepted in its exact terms. Rucker v. Sanders, 182 N. C., 607, 109 S. E., 857; Overall Co. v. Holmes, 186 N. C., 428, 119 S. E., 817; Gravel Co. v. Casualty Co.,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barnhardt v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Smiley v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- McCain v. Hartford Live Stock InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Brunhild v. . FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Miles F. Bixler Co. v. BrittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.