Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Utley v. Abruzzo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1985No. 84-479PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

As was recognized in State, ex rel. Davey, v. Owen (1937), 133 Ohio St. 96, 106 [10 O.O. 102], “[t]he writ of procedendo is merely an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to one of inferior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment. It does not in any case attempt to control the inferior court as to what that judgment should be. * * *” Accord State, ex rel. Federated Dept. Stores, Inc., v. Brown (1956), 165 Ohio St. 521, 525 [60 O.O. 486]. It is well-settled that the writ of procedendo will not issue for the purpose of controlling or interfering with ordinary court procedure, State, ex rel.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Davey v. OwenOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State ex rel. City of Cleveland v. CalandraOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. St. Sava Serbian Orthodox Church v. RileyOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State ex rel. Cochran v. QuillinOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State ex rel. Unger v. QuinnOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Reynolds v. BasingerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State ex rel. Sponaugle v. Hein (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State, Ex Rel. Doe v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. Russo, 90682 (1-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API