State ex rel. Utley v. Abruzzo
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
As was recognized in State, ex rel. Davey, v. Owen (1937), 133 Ohio St. 96, 106 [10 O.O. 102], “[t]he writ of procedendo is merely an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to one of inferior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment. It does not in any case attempt to control the inferior court as to what that judgment should be. * * *” Accord State, ex rel. Federated Dept. Stores, Inc., v. Brown (1956), 165 Ohio St. 521, 525 [60 O.O. 486]. It is well-settled that the writ of procedendo will not issue for the purpose of controlling or interfering with ordinary court procedure, State, ex rel.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Davey v. OwenOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- State ex rel. City of Cleveland v. CalandraOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. St. Sava Serbian Orthodox Church v. RileyOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Cochran v. QuillinOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State ex rel. Unger v. QuinnOhio Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by25 opinions
- State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. BasingerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. Sponaugle v. Hein (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State, Ex Rel. Doe v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Jefferson v. Russo, 90682 (1-14-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.