Yeshiva University v. Greenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The instant action arises out of a dispute between the parties concerning title to, and the right to commercially distribute, an antibody known as PHF-1 and its cell line. This antibody has the potential for use in diagnosing and treating Alzheimer’s disease. The record indicates that the defendant developed this antibody while employed by the plaintiff as a research associate in the Pathqlogy Department of the plaintiff’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine (hereinafter AECOM). The defendant worked in a laboratory headed by Dr. Peter Davies, who was conducting research relating to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cahill v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Doe v. PoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- University Patents, Inc. v. KligmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Danae Art International Inc. v. StalloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gallina v. GiacaloneNew York Supreme Court · 1997