Legal Opinion

Doe v. Poe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1993PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mangano, P. J.

The question to be resolved on this appeal is whether the plaintiff met his burden of demonstrating that certain communications are covered by the attorney-client privilege. In our view, the question must be answered in the negative.

The plaintiff (hereinafter the CEO), is a former Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and trustee of a Federally chartered savings bank. In 1985, he hired the defendant Peter Poe, a New York law firm, in connection with the bank’s acquisition of a "troubled” savings and loan association from the Federal Government. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Vizzari v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. First National Bank v. Highland Hardwoods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Smith v. ComasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Talvy v. American Red Cross in Greater New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. York Claims Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Rosa Hair Stylists, Inc. v. Jaber Food Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. State v. Fermenta ASC Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API