Legal Opinion

Redevelopment Agency v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1991No. Docket Nos. E007431, E007432, E007433PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, J.

We issued an alternative writ of mandate in these three consolidated proceedings to address a single issue: Does the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.— hereinafter cited as the CRL and/or by statutory section number only) contain an administrative review procedure which must be pursued and exhausted before a party is entitled to challenge a redevelopment agency’s adoption or amendment of a redevelopment plan in the courts? We originally concluded that such an administrative review procedure was contained in the CRL. We granted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Meaney v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Morgan v. Community Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Casa Blanca Beach etc. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API