Redevelopment Agency v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, J.
We issued an alternative writ of mandate in these three consolidated proceedings to address a single issue: Does the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.— hereinafter cited as the CRL and/or by statutory section number only) contain an administrative review procedure which must be pursued and exhausted before a party is entitled to challenge a redevelopment agency’s adoption or amendment of a redevelopment plan in the courts? We originally concluded that such an administrative review procedure was contained in the CRL. We granted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
- Redevelopment Agency v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evans v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Meaney v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Morgan v. Community Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Casa Blanca Beach etc. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024